Science-firstHonest reviewsUpdated 2026No cure claims. Ever.

The Grounding Cortisol Study, Explained

One study gets cited more than any other when someone claims grounding “works”: Ghaly and Teplitz, 2004, published in the Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. It is the paper behind most “grounding lowers cortisol” headlines you will see on product pages, including some of ours.

The short answer

The 2004 cortisol study is real and it did find a shift toward a more normal cortisol rhythm plus better self-reported sleep, but it was small, unblinded, and never designed to prove grounding works for everyone. Treat it as a lead worth knowing, not a verdict.

What did the 2004 cortisol study actually test?

Ghaly and Teplitz had a small group of adults sleep grounded overnight instead of on regular bedding. Researchers tracked cortisol, the hormone that normally rises in the morning and falls at night to help regulate your sleep-wake cycle. Alongside the hormone readings, participants also reported on their own sleep quality, pain and stress levels.

It was an unblinded pilot. Participants knew they were grounded, which matters more than it sounds, because expectation alone can change how someone rates their own sleep.

What did the researchers find?

The reported result was that cortisol patterns shifted toward a more typical day-night rhythm during the grounded nights, and participants said their sleep, pain and stress improved. That second part is entirely self-reported. Nobody hooked these people up to a polysomnograph to confirm they actually slept better; they said they did, which is a real outcome but a softer one than an objective measurement.

This is why The Science of Grounding Sheets: Every Study, Summarized treats it as the flagship sleep finding in the wider body of research, and why Do Grounding Sheets Work? What the Research Really Shows leans on it too. It is genuinely the best single data point the sleep claim has.

How strong is this evidence, really?

Here is the honest read. A small, unblinded, self-reported pilot from 2004 is a reasonable starting point for a hypothesis. It is not the kind of evidence that settles a question. No large, independently replicated, blinded trial with objective cortisol assays has confirmed it since, at least not that turns up in the current research.

What we know What we don’t know
Cortisol shifted toward a more normal rhythm in this pilot Whether that holds up in a blinded, larger sample
Participants reported better sleep, pain, and stress Whether that was the grounding itself or the expectation of it
Published in a peer-reviewed journal (JACM, 2004) Independent replication with objective sleep measures

It also does not sit alone. Sokal and Sokal ran a series of small experiments on calcium, thyroid and glucose markers. Chevalier and colleagues reported a small blood-viscosity study. The 2015 Oschman, Chevalier and Brown paper, covered in The 2015 Grounding Inflammation Review, Explained, is a narrative review proposing that grounding might work as an antioxidant mechanism, not a trial that proves it does. Same pattern across the board: small, early, often the same handful of researchers, a proposed mechanism rather than settled proof.

Does this mean grounding doesn’t work?

No, and that is a different claim. Unproven is not the same as disproven. Even critics who pick this literature apart, and we cover their case fairly in Earthing Debunked? A Fair Look at the Skeptics’ Arguments, tend to agree that sleep and relaxation are the outcomes with the least-weak evidence, while claims about disease treatment or prevention have essentially no support. Nobody serious should tell you grounding cures anything. That is not what this study, or any of the others, shows.

What the cortisol study does support, cautiously, is the idea that sleeping grounded is worth trying if better sleep or less evening stress is what you are after. Not a guarantee. A plausible, low-cost experiment.

Should this study change what you buy or do?

If you are weighing whether to try a grounding sheet at all, this is a reasonable place to land: the best-supported claim is modest, sleep-related, and comes from small studies, and the honest odds are that some of what people feel is placebo. We walk through that angle in Grounding and the Placebo Effect.

The physical risk is genuinely low for most healthy adults. The sheet connects to your outlet’s ground pin, not to live power, so the real-world danger is a badly wired outlet rather than the concept itself. A cheap outlet tester is worth the few dollars before your first night. If you have a pacemaker or other implanted device, are pregnant, or are on medication that affects your nervous system, talk to your doctor before adding grounding to your routine, since nobody has tested this on those groups specifically.

Our top pick

Premium Grounding Sheet

4.8/5 (654+ reviews)

30% stainless-steel fibers instead of silver, so it will not oxidize and lasts about five times longer. Fits under your fitted sheet, ships worldwide, and comes with a 90-night trial and a 3-year warranty.

Check price on Premium Grounding

If you want the full list of studies this claim is built on, not just the cortisol one, Grounding Sheet Clinical Studies: Full List lays them out with the same honesty: what was measured, how small the sample was, and where the gaps are.

Frequently asked questions

What journal was the grounding cortisol study published in?

Ghaly and Teplitz (2004) was published in the Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. It is peer-reviewed, but peer review confirms the methods were reported clearly, not that the sample size was large or the design was bulletproof.

How many people were in the study?

The original paper does not describe a large cohort; it was a small pilot group, not a big randomized trial. We won’t put an exact number here since the study is best described qualitatively as a small pilot rather than a precise headcount worth citing with confidence.

Was the cortisol study blinded?

No. Participants knew they were sleeping grounded, which means expectation could have shaped their self-reported results on sleep, pain and stress. That is the main limitation researchers and skeptics point to.

Has anyone repeated the cortisol study with a bigger sample?

Not that shows up in the current independent literature. Most of the follow-up work in this space comes from small studies, often from overlapping groups of researchers, rather than a large, blinded, independently replicated trial.

Should I expect a cortisol-level effect from a grounding sheet?

Treat it as a possibility worth testing for yourself over a couple of weeks, not a guaranteed outcome. The honest framing is promising for sleep, under-proven for everything else, low-risk to try.

Nora Whitfield
Nora WhitfieldSleep-environment writer. She has tested grounding sheets, mats and blankets hands-on since 2021 and reads the actual studies so you do not have to.